top of page

ASTROLOGY

BEGETS ASTRONOMY

Looking for answers in the night sky since the beginning of humanity

Ever since we have been able to turn our eyes to the sky, humans have been looking to the stars to uncover the purpose of the mysterious cosmos.

 

It was back in the mid-1600s that astronomy really had its moment. For centuries before, and owing much to a pre-renaissance society grounded in religion, astrology was the prime method for understanding the mysterious, shifting constellations. Astronomy and astrology were both interwoven, and it really wasn’t until the late 17th century that astrology was finally rejected as a fundamental method for understanding the planets and beyond[1].

 

The earliest historical astronomical observations date back to 1600 B.C. Babylonians recorded positions of planets and eclipses, and in European Culture, monuments such as Wiltshire’s Neolithic Stonehenge were erected to chart the path of the sun throughout the year (and for those interested, Stonehenge’s latitude is 51° 11')[2].

 

As culture developed, so people began to attribute stories and myths to the movements of these ethereal bodies, or planetes (wanderers), as the Greeks named them[3]. The Greeks developed a cosmological framework[4] of the solar system; determined the sizes of the Earth, Moon and Sun; the distance between the nearby planets; and eventually conceded that the Earth was indeed spherical (although there are some people who are still willing to debate this to this day…). They were eventually responsible for a geocentric model of the solar system: one which placed Earth at its very centre. It wasn’t perfect, but it was a step in the right direction.

Believing the heavens to be an orderly place, where things happened for a reason, people wondered what the purpose of the planets were. As previously stated, the general consensus at this point was that the Earth was the centre of the Solar System. Therefore, being a spiritual, and some could argue, slightly inward-looking bunch, it would be pretty obvious to assume that the planets served some purpose in our earthly lives. Some thought that huge throngs of angels moved the planets, but as others were perhaps not so convinced, astrology came to be.
It should be noted that around about the same time as the geocentric model was generally accepted, it was Aristarchus alone who proposed an early heliocentric model: a cosmology centred around the sun. However, thanks to religious doctrine, it would not be until the 1500s, the birth of the Renaissance and Copernicus, that the geocentric model would be challenged and eventually overthrown by Copernicus’ later successful version of the heliocentric model.

Stars

View of an outer nebula taken from Earth. 
Wix images 

During the continuous scrutiny of the early models of the solar system, there was little explanation for the ethereal bodies that roamed the night sky. Gravity was not to be discovered until Newton gave Halley (the guy that discovered the comet) a helping hand in August 1684[5], and so a solution came about in the form of early mythology.

​

Within the field of astrology, it was taught that the planets had great influence over the Earth, being able to affect both our moods and personalities. It was deduced that the higher a planet was in the sky at the time of our birth, the more affected we were by its pull. For example, those born under the rule of Saturn are susceptible to gloomy thoughts of apathy – bad news if you’re a Capricorn.
Under this train of thought, it was also possible to determine how an individual might react to certain, unspecified looming events. Furthermore, by following the paths of planets, one could also determine how that individual could best approach these situations; waiting to react until a certain, unhelpful planet had passed across the sky, or until a countervailing one had ascended.
 

This was all very well and good, and for a considerable amount of time not many people cared very much for the true nature of the planets or how they came to be. Not many, but Johannes Kepler was a man who definitely did.
A professor of Mathematics and an ardent astronomer, Kepler’s prime motivation was in trying to find a way to shield people from the sometimes inconvenient effects of the planets[6], but it was also his fervent belief in the Copernicus system which made him look to uncover the movement of the planets.
Sure, he was as religious as the next guy back then, and his belief that the sun was at the centre of the solar system had more to do with the linguistic implications of the term ‘Son of God’, than it having any grounds in actual science[7]. Nonetheless, it spurred him on to assess Tycho Brahe’s observational data of Mars[8], determining that its apparent backward trajectory was in fact a working of its own ellipses and Earth’s spinning axis[9]. These combined made it appear to move backwards across the sky at different times of the year. This planetary ellipse was thus seen to be an occurrence reflected across all of the planets, and so confirmed the heliocentric view that the Sun was indeed the central point around which all of the planets orbited.

 

In uncovering this elliptical information, Kepler went on to attribute the movements of the planets to three mathematical laws, all of which are still in use today:

 

1. All planets move in elliptical orbits, with the sun at one focus - that one’s pretty self-explanatory.

 

2. A line that connects a planet to the sun sweeps out equal areas in equal times - when it’s closer to the sun, it sweeps around faster, when it’s further away, it slows down.

 

3. The square of the period of any planet is proportional to the cube of the semimajor axis of its orbit. This law arises from Newton’s law of gravitation - don’t even expect me to explain this just yet, because I don’t think I can.[10]

 

And so it was that we understood the paths of the planets. Still, this didn’t explain why they perpetually circled the sun. And so let us refer back to that fateful summer of 1684, when a member of the Royal Society reached out to Isaac Newton for help understanding the ‘why’ behind Kepler’s three laws.

 

In truth, Mr. Newton was more into his alchemy than he was his astronomy, but after being hounded by Halley, Hooke and Wren, who needed help in calculating the precise force which determined a planets distance from the sun, he went on to not only successfully provide them with the correct calculations, but most prominently to ascertain that this force was Gravity[11].

 

From here, Halley went on to measure his comet’s movement around the sun, and many more astronomers and physicists made great contributions to our understanding of the Milky Way.

 

So it was that astrology began to fall out of favour as an explanation for the Natural World. Still, it was an important precursor to the understanding of the cosmos, and is still widely revered to this day.

SOURCES:

 

[1] http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/ast121/lectures/lec02.html

 

[2] http://www.math.nus.edu.sg/aslaksen/gem-projects/hm/0102-1-stonehenge/sun.htm

 

[3] Clark, Stuart. ‘The Unknown Universe in 10 Chapters’, Chapter 1, p. 20.

 

[4] http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/ast121/lectures/lec02.html

 

[5] Clark, Stuart. P. 25

 

[6] Clark, Stuart, p. 22

 

[7] https://www.space.com/15787-johannes-kepler.html

 

[8] Clark, Stuart, p. 23

 

[9] https://www.space.com/15787-johannes-kepler.html

 

[10] 1-3 of Kepler’s laws: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kepler.html

 

[11] Clark, Stuart, p.28

bottom of page